Fastest-Growing Cities: Percentage Growth vs. Residents Added

Celina leads percentage growth while Charlotte adds the most residents under our 20,000-person cutoff. Explore how growth measures change a city comparison.

Celina, TX grew by 24.6% between July 2024 and July 2025, adding 12,710 residents. Charlotte, NC added 20,731 residents, a larger numerical increase, but its percentage growth was 2.2%. Both statements can be true because the starting populations differ.

Celina leads percentage growth and Charlotte leads the absolute gain among covered places with at least 20,000 residents in July 2025. These are two distinct results from the same Census Vintage 2025 population series. A headline that calls one city “the fastest-growing” needs to name which measure and population threshold it uses.

Downtown Austin skyscrapers beneath a cloudy sky.

Selected city comparisons from the source data

These examples illustrate the article’s comparison; they are not a national ranking. Population filters use July 2025. Survey measures use ACS 2020–2024. Dollar estimates are in 2024 dollars; percentages keep their named source universes.

Selected places · estimates and 90% margins of error · shares show count / denominator
City Population · July 2025 people 2024–2025 growth percent Residents added or lost people
Celina city, TX 64,427 24.6% 12,710
Fulshear city, TX 64,630 21.0% 11,196
Charlotte city, NC 964,784 2.2% 20,731
Fort Worth city, TX 1,028,117 1.9% 19,512
San Antonio city, TX 1,548,422 0.9% 14,359
Seattle city, WA 784,777 1.5% 11,572
Houston city, TX 2,397,315 0.5% 11,515
Austin city, TX 1,002,632 0.4% 4,025

Percentage growth gives smaller places more room to lead

The percentage calculation divides the change by the previous population. Adding 1,000 residents to 10,000 gives a 10% increase; adding 1,000 to 100,000 gives a 1% increase. This arithmetic example explains the effect of the starting size without making any claim about those hypothetical places’ housing or employment.

In the observed data, Fulshear, TX added 11,196 residents, while Houston, TX added 11,515. Their numerical gains are much closer than their percentage growth rates: 21.0% and 0.5%, respectively. Reading only the percentage would obscure the scale of the change.

The population cutoff changes the answer

Our comparison includes places with at least 20,000 residents at the end of the period. This makes the eligibility date explicit. A publication using 20,000 residents at the beginning can omit a place that crosses that threshold during the year. Neither table should be cited without its cutoff.

Raise the minimum population in the explorer to 100,000 or 500,000 and compare the leading rows again. You are changing the set of places, not recalculating their observed growth. This sensitivity check is useful when a mover wants a midsize or large city rather than every municipality in the country. The filter does not establish a city’s metropolitan size.

One revised Census series keeps the calculation consistent

Each PEP vintage revises the earlier estimates in its time series. We use the July 2024 and July 2025 observations from Vintage 2025, rather than subtracting a number from an older release. The population reference year is 2025; the source release was published in May 2026.

Census geographic guidance explains that a vintage uses updated boundaries for its series. An estimate can consequently differ from an older published number for the same year. Check a city’s history and the source vintage before concluding that the difference between two articles measures population change.

The table gives the signed numerical difference and percentage from the same source. Population decline remains negative, and a zero previous estimate would make percentage growth unavailable. Counts are not annual census enumerations: they are official estimates between censuses.

Growth is a starting point for housing research

A rising population can motivate questions about housing construction, rental availability, transportation and local services. The growth table cannot answer those questions by itself. It does not demonstrate that rents increased, identify why residents moved or count new homes built in the city.

Use the population history alongside the housing survey window. ACS 2020–2024 rent and home values describe an earlier pooled period than the July 2025 population estimate. For a rapidly changing place, those figures may be useful structural context while current listings and construction records provide another view.

The fastest-growing-city ranking documents eligibility and shows the national percentage order. The explorer here lets you switch between percentage growth, added residents and total population. Its CSV keeps both source years and the signed change, making the result reproducible without relying on a headline.

Explore the city data

Search the underlying covered-city observations, narrow the state and population, and choose a measure to sort. The table includes missing and open-ended values when another measure is available. The chart draws only usable exact values for the chosen measure; intervals are never treated as precise amounts.

Loading the full city explorer. The selected source observations above are available without JavaScript.

City data chart; loading observations
A chart of exact point estimates. Capped uncertainty lines show available 90% MOEs; percentage intervals are clipped to their physical range of 0–100%. No significance test is implied.
Matching source observations · 25 places per page
City Population · July 2025 Population · July 2025 people 2024–2025 growth percent Residents added or lost people
The interactive table requires JavaScript. Source examples are published above.
Page 1

Measures and source universes

Population · July 2025
Residents of the Census place · Census PEP Vintage 2025 · people
2024–2025 growth
Residents of the Census place · Census PEP Vintage 2025; 100 × change / previous population · percent
Residents added or lost
Residents of the Census place · Census PEP Vintage 2025; 2025 population − 2024 population · people

Survey percentages use approximate subset-ratio MOEs from the retained count cells. Population and Gazetteer calculations have no numerical sampling MOE here. Read the calculations and limitations before comparing small differences.

Sources and reproducible analysis

This article uses retained original Census records, joined by exact place GEOID. The data review date is September 30, 2026. Population uses Vintage 2025 estimates; survey observations use ACS 2020–2024. Our calculations describe the covered place universe, with no substitution of county or metropolitan figures. The original records and release manifest are available through data downloads.

Methods and uncertainty explain derived shares, open-ended medians and geographic compatibility. Report a correction with the figure, source and article address. Statistics do not represent personal resident experiences or a universal assessment of a place.

More city research

All city research articles · U.S. city rankings · Compare U.S. cities

What can we help you find?

Type at least two letters to start searching.

Browse cities Esc to close